Physician, Heal Thyself

Alright conservatives.  Let’s hear your defense for this one.

By Kathleen Parker at Townhall.com:

WASHINGTON — Allow me to introduce myself. I am a traitor and an idiot. Also, my mother should have aborted me and left me in a dumpster, but since she didn’t, I should “off” myself.

Those are just a few nuggets randomly selected from thousands of e-mails written in response to my column suggesting that Sarah Palin is out of her league and should step down.

Who says public discourse hasn’t deteriorated?

The fierce reaction to my column has been both bracing and enlightening. After 20 years of column writing, I’m familiar with angry mail. But the past few days have produced responses of a different order. Not just angry, but vicious and threatening.

Some of my usual readers feel betrayed because I previously have written favorably of Palin. By changing my mind and saying so, I am viewed as a traitor to the Republican Party — not a “true” conservative.

Obviously, I’m not employed by the GOP. If I were, they’re seriously in arrears. But what is a true conservative? One who doesn’t think or question and who marches in lockstep with The Party?

The emotional pitch of many comments suggests an overinvestment in Palin as “one of us.”

Palin’s fans say they like her specifically because she’s an outsider, not part of the Washington club. When she flubs during interviews, they identify with that, too. “You see the lack of polish, we applaud it,” one reader wrote.

Of course, there’s a difference between a lack of polish and a lack of coherence. Some of Palin’s interview responses can’t even be critiqued on their merits because they’re so nonsensical. But even that is someone else’s fault, say Palin supporters. The media make her uncomfortable.

Or, it’s the fault of those slick politicos who are overmanaging her. “Let Sarah be Sarah” has become the latest rallying cry among my colleagues on the right. She’ll be fine if we just leave her alone, they say. Between prayers, I might add.

Not all my mail has been mean-spirited. A fair number expressed polite disappointment; others relief and gratitude. Still others offered reasonable arguments aimed at changing my mind. I may yet.

In the meantime, this assault and my decision to write about it aren’t really about me — or even Sarah Palin. The mailbag is about us, our country, and what we really believe.

That we have become a partisan nation is no secret. This week has provided a vivid example of where rabid partisanship leads with the failure of Congress to pass a bailout bill vitally needed to keep our economy from unraveling.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave a partisan speech, blaming the credit crisis on the Bush administration (omitting the Clinton administration’s role in launching the subprime lending debacle). Republicans responded by voting against the bill.

Everyone’s to blame, by the way.

Such extreme partisanship has a crippling effect on government, which may be desirable at times, but not now. More important in the long term is the less tangible effect of stifling free speech. My mail paints an ugly picture and a bleak future if we do not soon correct ourselves.

The picture is this: Anyone who dares express an opinion that runs counter to the party line will be silenced. That doesn’t sound American to me, but Stalin would approve.

Readers have every right to reject my opinion. But when we decide that a person is a traitor and should die for having an opinion different than one’s own, then we cross into territory that puts all freedoms at risk. (I hear you, Dixie Chicks.)

I’m sure it is coincidence that, upon the Palin column’s publication, a conservative organization suddenly canceled a speech I was scheduled to deliver in a few days. If I were as paranoid as the conspiracy theorists are, I might wonder whether I was being punished for speaking incorrectly.

Unfortunately, that’s the way one begins to think when party loyalty is given a higher value than loyalty to bedrock principles.

Our day of reckoning, indeed, may be upon us. Between war and economic collapse, we have enormous challenges. It will take the best of everyone to solve them. That process begins minimally with a commitment to engage in civil discourse and a cease-fire in the war against unwelcome ideas.

In that spirit, may Sarah Palin be fearless in Thursday’s debate and speak her true mind.

Kathleen, now you know how the people who comprise your party’s base really are.  Welcome to what we get to experience.

Gee whiz, how could we ever even think of comparing them to fascists, guys?  Guys?

…hello?

Tags: , ,

7 Responses to “Physician, Heal Thyself”

  1. ollie Says:

    Yeah, I liked that column too. :)

  2. postsimian Says:

    Heh, just checked your post from yesterday. It’s pretty damning, isn’t it?

  3. dd Says:

    I’m not a conservative, but I think the Palin-is-an-idiot crowd is: 1) over reacting and 2) underestimating her appeal. First, to paraphrase the old joke - she’s not as dumb as she sounds. She couldn’t be. And, the only reason that the media isn’t picking on the less-than-coherent ramblings of our VP candidate is that they have Palin to pick on (and let’s be honest - a bias in favor of his positions on the issue). Second, Parker and others miss the point: Palin is supposed to energize the conservative base. This elections, is all about GOTV - and she will Get Out The (conservative) Vote - even more so if the base sees her as being picked on by the liberal media. Maybe Parker is even engaged in counter-ops - appear to be attacking her to help her. Sounds like Rove, doesn’t it? My point is, don’t help her do her job. The best thing that we could do about Palin is ignore her.

  4. postsimian Says:

    This wasn’t so much about Palin as it was about the conservative voting base, but your point is well taken. You’re right about her appeal; she excites the base more than McCain ever could alone, or with virtually any other candidate from the primaries. It was a smart pick, politically. As a matter of national interest, not so much.

    Ideological differences aside, I wouldn’t describe her as dumb. She held her own when running for governor and did manage to capture the office. There’s something to be said about that. On the other hand, Alaskan politics is so far removed from national politics, which deals mainly with the lower 48, I’m sure most would agree. Her main problem is that she’s out of her element and is not nearly as familiar with (nor has an understanding of) national politics as she is with her state politics. Makes sense in the scope of being a governor, but not someone at the bottom of a presidential ticket. That’s my main beef, anyway.

    At any rate, I’m glad she’s been (mostly) out of the headlines.

  5. Corina Says:

    “But what is a true conservative? One who doesn’t think or question and who marches in lockstep with The Party?”

    …um…yes? Isn’t that common knowlege? :p

  6. Jadedgirl Says:

    First, to paraphrase the old joke - she’s not as dumb as she sounds. She couldn’t be.

    Um…look at GW Bush…he IS as dumb as he sounds…actually dumber.

    He’s a freakin retard.

    And so is Palin.
    BUT…she’s gonna get out her can of “maverick” and put it all over us here Americans…you betcha.
    Can I call you Joe??????

    Seriosuly?????

    UGH.

  7. postsimian Says:

    *watches Jaded get super punchy*

    *munches on some popcorn as the beating ensues*

Leave a Reply