Whoa.

I decided to get my science fix today and stumbled upon this article from Space.com:

Mysterious New ‘Dark Flow’ Discovered in Space
By Clara Moskowitz
Staff Writer
posted: 23 September 2008
12:46 pm ET

As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren’t vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can’t be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon “dark flow.”

The stuff that’s pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don’t just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there’s a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can’t know how big the whole universe is), but we can’t see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

“We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure,” Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. “The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure.”

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn’t contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

“The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe,” Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. “Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation.”

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

“It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else,” Kashlinsky said. “For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now.”

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what’s going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.

Holy shit.  First off, to think of the known universe in terms of light is new to me, but also to think that what we know exists could be infinitely larger–we just can’t see it yet.

You may have heard of the “pulsing universe” theory (can’t remember the exact name) in which the universe expands and contracts constantly.  The Big Bang would be an expansion.  What this article seems to suggest might be a contraction.  Or an expansion.  It really doesn’t say whether we’re moving towards something or away from it, only that there is a “flow.”

Or, perhaps we’re in either a contraction or expansion as a whole, but this has nothing to do with it.  We could just be hurling towards some gigantic center of mass we just can’t see yet, itself being pulled in a contraction or propelled in an expansion.  The fact that it is currently impossible to see that far since the light hasn’t reached us yet is a very telling testament to just how big the universe is… as well as the fact that we have no friggin’ clue.

Try to imagine how many atoms are in baseball.  What if the vast amount of space we can see is, comparatively, the size of one of those atoms, whereas all the other atoms in the baseball are what we can’t see.

What if the object were larger or more dense?  What if it was a diamond the size of the moon?  Does it need to stop there?  What if it doesn’t?

It’s been awhile since I tried to comprehend “infinity” or the size of the universe.  Once I walked from the town square in Washington, IL, to Avanti’s in East Peoria.  Yeah, it just happened that way.  Anyway, to keep my mind occupied, I was trying to imagine the distance to the moon in footsteps.

I couldn’t do it.  I can look at estimates that place it as 250,000 miles away, but to mentally comprehend it in immediate, spatial terms, comparing the distance you travel every day or the size of your body compared to all that space?  It blows my mind.  Pile onto that the distance between here and the Sun, or the size of the solar system.  Add to that the realization that there are billions of stars in this galaxy, and there are billions of galaxies in the known universe, and the distinct possibility that comparing the size of our universe to a drop in the ocean may be the most incredible understatement in existence…  it’s incredible, and if you think about it too long, your head will hurt.

Maybe this would be a good time to mention how wonderful it is to be part of a species which is capable of encumbering such thoughts, yet still retain and utilize the ability to define our own purpose.

Tags:

10 Responses to “Whoa.”

  1. Jk Says:

    First we thought there was one planet. Then we found out there are many planets. Then we thought there was one Sun, then we found out the countless stars are suns, too. Then we thought there was one galaxy, and Hubble showed us there were billions of galaxies. It wouldn’t surprise me if there were billions of big-bangs going off periodically, outside of the realm of anywhere our senses could ever take us. Why not? We’ve been continually humbled by any attempt to put space into a finite container.

  2. cjay Says:

    Dude. The dark matter is following the path of the Beam. Duh.

  3. Linda Says:

    Wow, that just gave me a panic attack. Warn me when you are posting about space and infinity and the known vs. unknown universe. Crap freaks my brain out.

  4. Brick Says:

    I think my head just exploded.

    Yep . . . that was my head . . . exploding.

  5. cjay Says:

    Correction: that was Brick’s head doing the Big Bang.

  6. Billie Bob Jolie Says:

    PS,

    I wrote you a reply yesterday on PI’s site, but it (and another comment I made) didn’t post. I tried again today from a different computer, but again nothing happened. I don’t want to throw out accusations, but it appears I’ve been banned from participating on PI’s site.

    Rather than write it again, I found a website called http://www.christian-thinktank.com/ that has a scholarly rebuttal to all of the topics we discussed.

    For instance, in the story about the bears, the word used for the 42 “children” is a Hebrew word used for men aged 12-40. “Little Children” was an English translation error. Basically, Elisha was getting gang raped by 42 men who could have been as old as 40. Makes you think differently of the situation and question what was actually going on.

    That is something I didn’t know, and the folks who are maintaining the site are much more knowledgeable than I.

    I concede that our discussion will go nowhere, because every time I find myself in this situation it seems I try to talk intelligently but get hit by a cocktail of hatred, confusion, clever insults, and misinterpretation and it goes nowhere.

    Billie Bob.

  7. shay Says:

    I see evidence that our universe is like a bubble at the bottom of a glass of beer. As we rise, we expand.
    Then, when we reach the top…

    <>

    We are splattered out into the multiverse medium or into any number of surrounding universes in the sudsy froth.

    I will have to conduct more observation while at the next blogger bash.

  8. postsimian Says:

    You make the universe sound so delicious.

    Nice site, by the way. I’ll be keeping tabs on you. :)

  9. shay Says:

    Thank you. Actually, the site belongs to Peoria Astronomical Society. I just linked to it because its an excellent resource for astro stuff & sometimes tells about Peoria area star parties & events & lectures, etc. I’m a longtime member.
    I just found out about blogs a few months ago while trying to research the Gordon -Krupa campaign via google & had to go to Billy Dennis’ Peoria Pundit.blogpeoria site to get a look at a press release.
    Then I hit my 1st blogger ball.
    Boy was it loud.
    It was a blast & I knew a half a dozen people.
    At that time, I was so new that I did not even know about Peoria Chronicle yet. I have witnessed the Howie Dance and heard several of his sermons from the barstool live.
    I still haven’t got the guts to get my own site, cause it could probably get addictive & I usually don’t like to throw opinions out there for everyone to see unless I have thought about them a while.

    … nice to visit with you.

    -Scott

  10. postsimian Says:

    shay - Roger that, thanks for visiting :)

    BBJ - Two problems with that site: 1) it’s written by someone with no academic credentials on the subject. 2) it uses the bible to prove the bible. This is the equivalent of me writing down “Mittens the cat is the god of the universe,” then, when asked to provide evidence, resort to the paper on which I had written the claim.

    That is to say, using the source of the claim as evidence of the claim is logically incoherent and does not make a valid, or even intelligible, argument. This wouldn’t be a problem if Christians weren’t so patently and historically dishonest about Christianity.

    And, now that I think about it, 3) the site is a steaming horse-shit pie. Honestly, have you taken a moment to read these arguments? He’s making them up as he goes, conjuring them out of thin air. Throw in a few anthropological terms with biblical analysis and you have a sugar-coated horse shit pie. I could spend weeks rebutting his drivel if I weren’t preoccupied with my family, school or work. Maybe, if it’s still around after I graduate, I’ll do just that. But then again, I’d hate to think this site is popular.

    So, I’ll tell ya what: provide me with a neutral, secular (ie non-Christian) source which verifies your claims, and we’ll talk. If you’re just going to throw out the first thing you come across in Google, forget it. I’ll just respond with the first thing I find, and I promise you the conversation will be ridiculous and go nowhere.

Leave a Reply